<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Edgewood GC: Recalling a Course Blotted Out by Progress	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.halphillips.net/edgewoodgcrecallingacourseblottedoutbyprogress/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.halphillips.net/edgewoodgcrecallingacourseblottedoutbyprogress?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=edgewoodgcrecallingacourseblottedoutbyprogress</link>
	<description>Small-Batch Journalism &#38; Comment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 17:29:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hal Phillips		</title>
		<link>https://www.halphillips.net/edgewoodgcrecallingacourseblottedoutbyprogress#comment-30136</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hal Phillips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 17:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halphillips.net/?p=673#comment-30136</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.halphillips.net/edgewoodgcrecallingacourseblottedoutbyprogress#comment-30132&quot;&gt;Ray&lt;/a&gt;.

Agreed on 7. There are lots of bits that remain: The green on 9 used to be the business end of a long par-3, now a dogleg right par 4. But I&#039;m honestly not sure about today&#039;s 10. I rememeber negotiating the tree, but I have played the course a couple times since 1984. My question: how did it link back up to the rest of the routing? That stumps me, cuz the closest hole to 10 green would have been 18, the par-3 finisher. And 11-15 are all NEW holes... Check out this 1934 aerial of Cromwell. Course is located at 2-3 o&#039;clock. The no. 10 we remember is not there but the course shurely changed over time. https://cdm15019.contentdm.oclc.org/customizations/collection/p4005coll10/pages/maps/maps_1934_cromwell.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.halphillips.net/edgewoodgcrecallingacourseblottedoutbyprogress#comment-30132">Ray</a>.</p>
<p>Agreed on 7. There are lots of bits that remain: The green on 9 used to be the business end of a long par-3, now a dogleg right par 4. But I&#8217;m honestly not sure about today&#8217;s 10. I rememeber negotiating the tree, but I have played the course a couple times since 1984. My question: how did it link back up to the rest of the routing? That stumps me, cuz the closest hole to 10 green would have been 18, the par-3 finisher. And 11-15 are all NEW holes&#8230; Check out this 1934 aerial of Cromwell. Course is located at 2-3 o&#8217;clock. The no. 10 we remember is not there but the course shurely changed over time. <a href="https://cdm15019.contentdm.oclc.org/customizations/collection/p4005coll10/pages/maps/maps_1934_cromwell.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://cdm15019.contentdm.oclc.org/customizations/collection/p4005coll10/pages/maps/maps_1934_cromwell.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray		</title>
		<link>https://www.halphillips.net/edgewoodgcrecallingacourseblottedoutbyprogress#comment-30132</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 21:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halphillips.net/?p=673#comment-30132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pretty sure 7 and 10 are also very similar to what they used to be. I remember trying to carve a 1 iron by that tree in the middle of the fairway on 10 in the Connecticut Medal Play amateur back in the late 70s early 80s]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure 7 and 10 are also very similar to what they used to be. I remember trying to carve a 1 iron by that tree in the middle of the fairway on 10 in the Connecticut Medal Play amateur back in the late 70s early 80s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hal Phillips		</title>
		<link>https://www.halphillips.net/edgewoodgcrecallingacourseblottedoutbyprogress#comment-297</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hal Phillips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 19:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halphillips.net/?p=673#comment-297</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.halphillips.net/edgewoodgcrecallingacourseblottedoutbyprogress#comment-296&quot;&gt;Alex Dahlem&lt;/a&gt;.

You may well be right, Alex. That&#039;s what Wikipedia says, but I could have sworn it was TPC of Cromwell, for the name of the town where it resides. To be honest, TPC of Connecticut would have made more sense: more general, and recognizable. But I coulda sworn... But the course today is without a doubt better than Edgewood ever was. Very few original holes were kept: #3, a long par-4 is pretty much the same, I believe, and #4 is very similar. Today&#039;s #8, a par-3 over water, is very much the same but it wasn&#039;t #8... The 9th green today serves a dogleg right par-4; back in the day, that same green served a long par-3. The signature finish of today&#039;s TPC is a mind-bender for those who knew Edgewood. Today&#039;s par-3 16th green served a par-3 that played downhill from almost the completely opposite direction. Today&#039;s 17th green served another par-3 that played from about the same angle as today&#039;s approach shots, only further back and up the hill. The driving range today was the old 10th hole. Edgewood finished with a par-4 (17) that played along a ridge that today frames the right side of 18. The old 18th was a par-3 that played back across the valley (across what is today the 18th green) to the clubhouse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.halphillips.net/edgewoodgcrecallingacourseblottedoutbyprogress#comment-296">Alex Dahlem</a>.</p>
<p>You may well be right, Alex. That&#8217;s what Wikipedia says, but I could have sworn it was TPC of Cromwell, for the name of the town where it resides. To be honest, TPC of Connecticut would have made more sense: more general, and recognizable. But I coulda sworn&#8230; But the course today is without a doubt better than Edgewood ever was. Very few original holes were kept: #3, a long par-4 is pretty much the same, I believe, and #4 is very similar. Today&#8217;s #8, a par-3 over water, is very much the same but it wasn&#8217;t #8&#8230; The 9th green today serves a dogleg right par-4; back in the day, that same green served a long par-3. The signature finish of today&#8217;s TPC is a mind-bender for those who knew Edgewood. Today&#8217;s par-3 16th green served a par-3 that played downhill from almost the completely opposite direction. Today&#8217;s 17th green served another par-3 that played from about the same angle as today&#8217;s approach shots, only further back and up the hill. The driving range today was the old 10th hole. Edgewood finished with a par-4 (17) that played along a ridge that today frames the right side of 18. The old 18th was a par-3 that played back across the valley (across what is today the 18th green) to the clubhouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex Dahlem		</title>
		<link>https://www.halphillips.net/edgewoodgcrecallingacourseblottedoutbyprogress#comment-296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Dahlem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 18:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halphillips.net/?p=673#comment-296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I believe it was called Tpc of Connecticut not Tpc of Cromwell. And to tell you the truth I think it is now a wonderful layout with probably the most exciting finish on the pga tour]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it was called Tpc of Connecticut not Tpc of Cromwell. And to tell you the truth I think it is now a wonderful layout with probably the most exciting finish on the pga tour</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
